VACP Requests Rescission of Parole of Vincent Martin Pending IG Investigation
The Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police is requesting a rescission of the parole of Vincent Martin pending the completion of the Inspector General's investigation. The urgency of this request is related to the planned release of Vincent Martin on Monday, ironically the beginning of Police Memorial Week.
For the past month, we have been in contact with retired and active Richmond Police officers with great concern about the release of Vincent Martin, who was convicted for the 1979 felony murder of Officer Michael Connors. Last year when Martin was reviewed for parole, his release was not recommended by the Parole Board.
This year, when Martin was approved for parole, there was a huge outcry of protest from the law enforcement community and from victims. We have heard from them and taken seriously their pleas for assistance. Here are some of the issues that concern our police chiefs:
What changed about Vincent Martin in one year that made him worthy of parole?
What happened in the hearing examination process that may have been in violation of law, rules, regulations or ethical considerations that resulted in a release decision?
Is it proper and ethical for the Parole Board Chair to initiate an investigation into Martin's trial and conviction without benefit of the judicial system to question whether Martin is innocent? Is that power within the purview of the Parole Board? If there is a question of innocence, why isn't that a decision for the courts?
The Connors family confirms that they have not been contacted in the past forty years whenever Martin has been reviewed for parole, a notice right that is guaranteed to them in the Virginia Constitution.
How is it proper for the outgoing Parole Board chair, now a juvenile court judge, to chastise the Richmond Police Chief and the VACP Executive Director in an official Parole Board release for raising our opposition to the release of Martin?
The Board's processing of parole reviews in the past two months has happened at a furious pace, which begs the question: how can the Board and its staff fully review and do due diligence in the review and approval of parole? How many victims and Commonwealths' Attorneys have not received the proper notice and opportunity to engage in the parole process during this time? Do concerns about the COVID 19 virus outweigh the Constitutional rights of victims? How far can the authority of the Parole Board be extended administratively to allow the waiver of normal procedures and rules, and under what circumstances?
Since the Inspector General's investigation concerns the release of an inmate who was convicted of a capital crime, his release must be stopped immediately and the serious allegations about Parole Board improprieties must be investigated.
Please help us make sure that a terrible miscarriage of justice does not occur. Virginia's police chiefs have a moral, professional and ethical responsibility to ask for the allegations to be fully investigated. We believe that Virginians expect that a fair and open parole review process of all violent felons be conducted prior to the release of any more inmates - particularly convicted cop killer Vincent Martin.
We know that numerous letters and phone calls have been sent to the Parole Board, to your office and to legislators raising our concerns and asking for a stay of the release of Martin. Our requests have fallen on deaf ears. Virginia's law enforcement community and the members of the VACP are committed to making sure that any and all wrongs are righted, and that the life sentence of Vincent Martin is carried out as directed by the courts. We owe this and so much more to the family of slain Richmond Officer Michael Connors.
Chief Howard Hall, President
Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police and Foundation
Dana G. Schrad, Executive Director
Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police